Completing EDUC 4151

For EDUC 4152, I will be building an online course geared towards teaching art online. I will building this course as a resource for faculty, graduate students, and administrators at Emily Carr University. One of the challenges of creating an online teaching course for art and design is that there is not a lot of external resources on teaching art online. The majority of articles, research, and resources are more general. I will have to marry my knowledge of online teaching with my knowledge of art instruction. In addition, I plan on talking to faculty who have been teaching online for a while to get insight on how they run art specific components including sharing artwork in progress, critiques, and delivering art demos. I hope an combination of internal and external research will make a course that reflect the needs of the Emily Carr community.

I am hoping to launch the course in the summer of 2021. However, a few details need to be confirmed such as, whether or not it will be taught at specific times or on a rolling basis. I imagine it will be an open resource combined with an instructor led class before every term. I am planning on figuring out these details in the coming weeks.

As mentioned above, some of the factors I need to consider are:

  • How and how often the course will be delivered? Will I lead it on a semester basis or will it be open all the time. This will determine how the content is delivered through Moodle and what aspects will be facilitated. Also, it will determine whether or not there are any synchronous discussions.
  • What are the primary needs from semester based courses and continuing studies based courses? I would like to make this course applicable be both regular semester courses and continuing studies. Therefore, I will be consulting with continuing studies to see how their needs may differ and how I can incorporate them into the course.
  • The length and commitment level of the course is also another consideration I need to make. I need to consider what faculty are willing and able to commit too? What barriers they may face? And how to make the resource as accessible and available to all of them. This will also impact how I create assessments. I will be meeting with representatives from different departments to gauge what their needs are and interests levels in taking the course.

Overall, I am excited about EDUC 4152 and am looking forward to learning and building the course. Throughout EDUC 4151 I learned a lot of useful things about online teaching. In particular how to building community online, which is a huge struggle right now with COVID-19. I also found that the research on discussion forums and facilitation was very informative and useful, especially as I look to incorporating that knowledge into online critiques. I would like to incorporate tools I learned on community building, facilitation, and assessments in my online course.

Pressbooks

Pressbooks in as open resource targeted towards faculty and students in BC. I am including it as a separate entry so I do not forget! I am hoping to draw from Pressbooks free resources on Online Teaching for the upcoming course I am designing.

https://open.bccampus.ca/create-open-textbooks/using-pressbooks/

Assessment Activity Plan

This activity/module will focus on how to deliver art critiques online. It will be delivered through Moodle and will be part of a larger course on online teaching for art and design. The students of the course will include instructors within the faculty of art and design at Emily Carr University including;

· graduate students and/or teaching assistants

· sessional instructors

· new instructors

· tenured faculty

· Age range 25-65+

· Education level: Graduate degree or higher. Some learners may be in the middle of their graduate degree.

· The majority of learners are new to online teaching but, a few are seasoned online instructors.

MODULE 4: Online Critiques

Learning Objectives:

  • Identify the differences and similarities between facilitating a face-to-face critique and an online critique.
  • Demonstrate potential challenges when facilitating an online critique; and identify key components of a skillfully facilitated online critique.
  • Develop a plan for delivering and facilitating an art critique online. 
  • Identify potential learning tools and/or platforms for online art critiques. 

MODULE 4 Checklist

  • Read course resources
  • Watch course resources
  • Post to the discussion forum
  • Complete Online Art Critique Proposal

MODULE 4 Resources

Watch “Room of Silence” 

Sherrid, E. (2016, March 31). Room of Silence. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/161259012

Read “Can you Teach Art Online?”

Dancewicz, K. (2020, April 17). Can You Teach Art Online? Retrieved from https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/teaching-art-online-covid-19-professors-strategies-1202684147

Watch “Teaching Studio Art Online: 5 Ways to Critique Art Online”

Art Prof: Create & Critique. (2020, March 14). Teaching Studio Art Online: 5 Ways to Critique Art Online. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQgSdwl4GNo

Read “A teacher’s guide to moderating online discussion forums: From theory to practice”

Feenberg, Andrew & Xin, Cindy. (2002). A teacher’s guide to moderating online discussion forums: From theory to practice. Retrieved April. 28. 2005.

Read “Developing Learning Community in Online Asynchronous College Courses: The Role of Teaching Presence”

Shea, P., Li, C., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2019). Developing Learning Community in Online Asynchronous College Courses: The Role of Teaching Presence. Online Learning, 9(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779

MODULE 4: Activities

Discussion Forum Post (Ungraded)

Use the Moodle discussion forum provided

Reflect on what you have learned so far. In your experience, what are some key differences and between facilitating a face-to-face critique and an online critique? Share your thoughts and respond to 2 or more of your peers. 

Online Critique Proposal (15%)

Write a proposal for how you would deliver and facilitate a critique online. Reflect on what you know about facilitating face-to-face critiques, and combine it with what you have learned about facilitating them online. You can use any medium for this proposal (Word, InDesign, PowerPoint, Video etc.)

In the proposal answer the following question (15%):

  1. What are the differences and similarities between facilitating a face-to-face critique and an online critique?
  2. How will you deliver the art critique? What learning tools or platform will you use?
  3. How will students engage, share work, and interact in the critique?
  4. What challenges might you face when facilitating this online critique? How might you solve them?

This is how you will be graded:

 Highly Competent (3)Fairly Competent  (2)Not Yet Competent (1)
Proposal Format  (30%)Proposal is well-organized, clear, and concise. It is easy to read and follow. All the assignment components are there. All of the assignment components are present. However, the proposal lacks organization and clarity. Not all of the proposal components are present. It lacks organization and clarity.
Proposal Questions (30%)All of the proposal questions are addressed and answered comprehensively. All of the proposal questions are addressed and answered satisfactorily. Not all of the questions are addressed and/or do not have sufficiently developed answers.
Analysis & Evidence (30%) The proposal questions are answered with several external sources and with a critical and comprehensive analysis.  The proposal questions are answered with some external sources. The analysis is satisfactory. The proposal questions are answered without external sources or evidence. There is no clear analysis. 
Writing Skills (10%) Writing is clear, professional, and does not have grammatical errors. Writing contains minor grammatical errors and lacks clarity in some areas. Writing contains major grammatical errors and lacks clarity overall.

Rationale

The goal of this module is to give my learners the knowledge and teaching strategies to transition their face-to-face critiques online. Most of the learners for this course will be new or tenure instructors, graduate students, or administrators. The rationale behind the first learning objective is to encourage the students taking this course to take what they already know about critiques and compare it to online delivery. The following learning objectives focus on learning and researching about online facilitation and discussion monitoring, as well as the different learning tools or platforms that could be useful for an online art critique. The videos and articles I have provided address each of these aspects of an online art critique.

I have included articles on monitoring and facilitating discussion forums and their connection to teacher presence. Also, I included a video and article on teaching art online, and delivering critiques online. Lastly, I included a documentary on the intricacies of marginalization, race and identity in art critiques and art classes. Together, I hope to create a solid foundation for my learners to begin their research and move on to the assessment phase of the module.       

I chose a “Critique Proposal” because it is a tangible authentic assessment that would provide my learners with a plan and strategy for delivering their next art critique. As a course that is focused on professional development, the creation of teaching tools and strategies is an essential component of each module. I want my learners to feel that each assessment is a tool or resource they can draw from in their everyday teaching experience (Kelly, 2009). In Mark Lieberman (2018) interview with Dianne Conrad she argues for the importance of authentic assessments that encourage “real-life tasks or problems that learners can relate to” (pg.1). Delivering an art critique online is an issue instructor have been working through during COVID-19, and they often feel they are not prepared or comfortable delivering them asynchronously. Therefore, this assessment allows them to face this “real-life task” and work through it with research and supporting materials. Also, I want to adapt strategies from Universal Design for Learning by allowing my learners to use and research various learning tools and/or mediums for delivering their proposal (Toland, 2019). This assessment will allow my learners to receive feedback on the proposal before they deliver it to their students. 

            I am assessing the proposal through a rubric that focuses on four categories; 1) Proposal Format, 2) Proposal Questions, 3) Analysis & Evidence, and 4) Writing Skills. I decided to go with a rubric so that my learners could get comprehensive feedback on their proposal and to provide them with concrete guidelines on how to complete the proposal. The rubric provides them with the weight of each category and what they must achieve in order to be successful. It is a summative assessment as the goal is for the learners to take what they have learned and apply it to a final proposal.  However, since this course is geared towards professional development, I view the rubric and assessment as a tool for the learners to build on and apply. Hopefully, by doing the assessment they can gain insight and knowledge that they can bring forward in their virtual classroom and feel more confident when delivering online critiques. 

References

Art Prof: Create & Critique. (2020, March 14). Teaching Studio Art Online: 5 Ways to Critique Art Online. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQgSdwl4GNo

Bates, T. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age – Second Edition. Vancouver, B.C.: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev2/

Dancewicz, K. (2020, April 17). Can You Teach Art Online? Retrieved from https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/teaching-art-online-covid-19-professors-strategies-1202684147

Feenberg, Andrew & Xin, Cindy. (2002). A teacher’s guide to moderating online discussion forums: From theory to practice. Retrieved April. 28. 2005.

Kelly, R. (2009). Authentic Experiences, Assessment Develop Online Students’ Marketable Skills. Faculty Focus: Assessing Online Learning: Strategies, Challenges and Opportunities, 6-7.

Lieberman, M. (2018). Q&A: Toward Better Assessments in Online Courses. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/10/31/qa-strategies-better-assessments-online-learning.

Shea, P., Li, C., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2019). Developing Learning Community in Online Asynchronous College Courses: The Role of Teaching Presence. Online Learning, 9(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779

Sherrid, E. (2016, March 31). Room of Silence. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/161259012.

Room of Silence

This video is a documentary from Rhode Island School of Design. It is about the intersection of race and identity within the art institution and the classroom. I would like to include it in my online art teaching course I am developing as it addresses critical issues about race and identity that apply to both f2f and online learning.

ULD Resources

Some Universal Learning Design resources.

Free ULD Moodle Shell (Open-Source)

https://moodle.gprc.ab.ca/mod/resource/view.php?id=5674

ULD Guide

https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

ULD Teachers Guide

https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/for-educators/universal-design-for-learning/understanding-universal-design-for-learning

ULD Resource Website

http://udlresource.ca/

ULD Assessments

http://udloncampus.cast.org/page/assessment_udl

ULD Rubrics

http://udlresource.ca/2017/12/rubrics/

ULD Progression Rubric

U of T ULD Resources

Instructor Presence

Over the last several weeks, I have been doing a lot of research into instructor presence. In an online course instructor presence takes on many forms, from the planning and development stages of the course to the beginning, middle, and the end. The development and design of the course and learning environment is one of the first steps in developing a strong instructor presence because it presents the platform and roadmap for how students will interact with one another and the instructor (Shea et al., 2019).

Once the course starts instructor presence can be established and maintained through the following suggestions:

  • clear communication expectations ( how students can get in touch with the instructor, when to expect a response on questions, assignment feedback etc.)
  • One on one meetings with students or small group meetings (bi-weekly check-ins, beginning and end of term meetings, drop-in office “Zoom” office hours.)
  • Discussion facilitation including skillfully facilitating discussion forums by synthesizing comments, asking questions, and directed the conversation when needed (Feenberg & Xin, 2020).
  • Providing classroom updates (announcements, sharing resources).
  • Creating a weekly ritual with students such as sharing progress on art or writing, posting shared resources (Bonk, 2010).
  • Incorporate collaborative learning tools (Padlet, Jamboard, Miro).
  • Give timely and thorough feedback and assessments.

Above are some techniques and ideas to increase and maintain teacher presence throughout a course. Personally, I have tried and suggested some of the techniques including drop-in office hours, clear expectations, discussion facilitation, timely feedback, and collaborative learning tools. They worked well, and I noted an increase in student engagement, participation, and comfortability in engaging with the course. I would like try establishing a weekly ritual ritual with my students such as sharing their artwork in progress. I think this is a nice way to get to know students and to build community in a course. In addition, it allows me to become more familiar with student work and carter my content and teaching to suite their needs.


Bonk C (2010) 6. Building Community. https://youtu.be/t4gDUkEI14Q.

Shea, P., Li, C., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2019). Developing Learning Community in Online Asynchronous College Courses: The Role of Teaching Presence. Online Learning, 9(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779

Reflective Writing #3: How to Build and Maintain Community Online

Objective: What have you learned about this topic? 

Building a community can be a challenging task when designing and delivering online courses. Several aspects within a course contribute to successful community development. Shea et al., (2019) researched the importance of online community building for student success and retention in online classes. They found that teacher presence plays a significant role in the establishment and maintenance of an online community. Within their research on teacher presence, they found that the following aspects of teacher presences contributed the most to a sustained online community: 

The multivariate analysis reported suggests that effective instructional design and the skilled facilitation of discourse have a large positive effect on not only student satisfaction but students’ sense of being connected with and supported by their instructor and fellow students in online environments (p. 72). 

Therefore, their research concludes that a focus on a well-designed and well-facilitated course creates both a sense of community and ongoing support. Similarly, Conrad and Donaldson (2011) describe the importance of social presence in an online course. Conrad argues that the establishment of social presence within an online course is the instructor’s responsibility (p. 46). For the community to be built, instructors need to facilitate learner to learner engagement through strategies such as ice breakers, collaborative discussions, and other engagement strategies.  Through successful facilitation and social activities an online community can develop and continue throughout a course.

Curt Bonk (2010) outlines many ways for instructors to build community online including establishing weekly rituals, providing opportunities for giving and receiving knowledge, using learning tools, and creating collaborative projects. These suggestions point to the importance of teacher presences and how a well-designed course and facilitated discourse provide the space for an online community to grow.  

 
Reflective: What has been your experience with this topic? How has it impacted your life? 

I have spoken and worked with several instructors who experience difficulties in establishing and maintaining a sense of community within their courses. Instructors have often tried to use discussion forums to encourage students to engage in asynchronous discussions. However, they often find that students will make an initial post to a discussion forum with their work, but most students will not engage with supplemental replies. When I work with these instructors, they are usually not engaging in the discussions themselves and not providing clear instructions on expectations.   

In my own experience teaching online I found that creating a social presence requires prompts and facilitation. I usually suggest that instructors provide clear instructions for discussion forums rather than leaving them open. For example, I suggest that they direct students to reply to other student’s posts and provide criteria for what is expected. I feel that this contributes to teacher presence in the course and gives students some direction. I also find that in a large class dividing students into smaller groups (using Moodle groups) can generate more detailed and critical discussion conversation. It also allows the students to collaborate and get to know some of the students in the class more closely.  

I have also noted that disorganized and heavy content courses impact community building within a course. I have found that instructors who rely heavily on PDFs and readings, without other types of content and learning tools, struggle to establish a community at all. These courses are often the same ones that lack organization and clear directions, and a strong teacher presence within discussions. They may have good lectures and content, but the instructor is not necessarily facilitating discussion. As a result, students feel overwhelmed and feel that they do not have time to get to know or collaborate with one another. I often suggest using a weekly outline or directive words to give students clear direction, so they do not feel overwhelmed by content. I also suggest that instructors provide a more balanced approach to the course (more learner/learner content!) this includes using some of the activities suggested by Bonk, Conrad, and Donaldson.

Interpretive: What are your “aha” moments related to this topic? What new insights do you now have? 

One of my “aha” moments is definitely the importance of teacher presence and more particularly, how teacher presence is part of both the design and facilitation within a course. Shea et al., (2019) outline how skilled facilitation increases a sense of community within a course and this is definitely what I have witnessed as an instructional designer. Especially, when it comes to asynchronous discussion. Instructors that can facilitate and encourage student conversation build successful communities and friendships online. Also, I have not always thought about course design as teacher presence but framing it within teacher presence helps me rethink how course design can contribute to the sense of belonging and support that students need. 

My other “aha” moment was Conrad and Donaldson’s (2011) argument that social presence is the responsibility of the instructor. In face-to-face classes, establishing a social presence is much more organic; students engage with one another before, during, and after class. Whereas online, those sites for engagement and conversation need to be established and encouraged by the instructor through direct facilitation or prompts. This can be easier at the beginning of an online course with ice breakers but, as course progress and deadlines increase, maintaining a social presence online can be challenging. I think this is where course design and ongoing instructor facilitation play a key role. They can transition icebreaker activities into more critical and class-related conversations that still allow students to learn about and learn from one another.  


Decisional: How can this new learning be applied to your online course? 

The first thing I would like to focus on is facilitated discourse and how that is integrated within the design of a course. I would like to think more carefully about how I craft discussion forums including providing clear directions on both what to post and how to respond. In addition, I would also like to focus more on how I or my TA’s participate in those discussions. This goes for both my own courses and when I am working with instructors on how to create discussion forums.  

I would also like to establish some training material on teacher presence and social presence for faculty. These would include information on how to establish teacher and social presence in a course and how they contribute to community building. 

Lastly, I would like to try Bonk’s (2010) suggestion of a weekly ritual. I find that routines can be helpful for myself and students, and also provide a record of how the student’s work/discussion has developed. The weekly ritual might be a reflective discussion where students reflect on what they have read and engaged with that week and then have a conversation about some of the things that came up. Or in an art class, it might be posting progress on an art project with a short reflection on the progress. This would give students an idea of how other students are working on their art at home. Which I found has contributed to community building greatly. 

References

Bonk C (2010) 6. Building Community. https://youtu.be/t4gDUkEI14Q.

Conrad, Rita-Marie, and J. Ana. Donaldson. Engaging the Online Learner: Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction. Jossey-Bass, 2011.

Shea, P., Li, C., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2019). Developing Learning Community in Online Asynchronous College Courses: The Role of Teaching Presence. Online Learning, 9(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779

Reflective Writing #2: The Impact of the Online Environment

Objective: What have you learned about this topic?

The online learning environment is a crucial part of how learners engage and retain information in an online course. Oftentimes, instructors focus on content rather than peer to peer, or peer to expert interaction (Culatta, 2009). Richard Culatta (2009) explains the importance of a balanced online environment, where there is equal emphasis on learner/content, learner/learner, and learner/expert interaction. In addition to evaluating how learners engage in a course, using technology can facilitate different types of interaction and improve engagement throughout a course. In this reflection, I will be focusing on using blogs as a tool for creating an engaging environment that balances different types of learner interaction. In online learning, blogs are often used in a variety of ways. These include blogs for student research and reflection, peer to peer interaction, creative projects, and sometimes as an ongoing ePortfolio. Blogs are used both for individual courses or as an ongoing resource throughout multiple courses or an entire program. 

Moria Hunter (2008) argues that social network blogs “harness collective intelligence” and empower learners throughout a course (pg. 434). She shows how blogs do this by giving learners a sense of autonomy through the aesthetic control of the blog, its privacy, and format. Simultaneously, she also explains how they encourage a sense of community and collaboration through commenting, tagging, and sharing (p.434). Hunter shows how blogs are a multidimensional learning tool that promotes several types of learner interactions. Learners engage with one another, research content, their instructor, and the tool itself. 

The blog as a tool for learner autonomy and engagement is reinforced by Maryellen Weimer’s (2019) article on blogs as a tool for student engagement. Weimer argues that blogs allow students to engage, analyze, and ask questions about course content autonomously and comfortably. She explains how one instructor uses blogs for students to ask “complex and controversial” questions without revealing their identity to the class (13). They also allowed students to process course content before class discussion thus, creating a more critical and engaging peer to peer dialogue. 

            These ideas are expanded on in Darby and Nolan’s (2019) article on Teaching with Technology and Judith V. Boettcher’s (2016) book on teaching online. Both of these texts emphasize that intentionally using learning technology can create a sense of community, peer-interaction, and provide insights into individual skills and knowledge. Boettcher, Nolan and Darby highlight the importance of receiving insight and consent from students on what blogs or technology works for them in order to successfully create community and engagement. Therefore, when deciding on what tools or blogs to use, students should be part of the process.

Reflective: What has been your experience with this topic? How has it impacted your life?

            Throughout my time working with instructors on online courses, I have seen how various learning tools and technology are used, and how that effects student engagement. I find that most instructors new to online teaching will rely heavily on content rather than finding a balance between the three interactions outline by Culatta (2009); learner/learner, learner/expert, and learner/content.  When I was first starting to build online courses, I did the same. However, after research and experience, I have found that creating engaging content paired with learner and expert engagement creates a well-rounded course. In my time working at Emily Carr University, one of the ways instructors and I have established student engagement is with blogs.

            I have witnessed instructors working with blogs in various ways; some more successful than others. Some of the instructors I work with create one blog for the class and have various threads and posts related to different topics throughout the course. From my experience, this method doesn’t always encourage successful student engagement with the content or one another. As Hunter (2008) outlines, one of the important aspects of blogging in online learning is learner autonomy and empowerment. I find that using a single central blog for learner to learner, and learner to expert engagement does not always allow the students to question, critique, or engage with the content in a way where they feel comfortable to do so. For example, some students may feel more comfortable than others when posting to a central public blog. 

            Whereas when each student has their own blog, they engage with content critically through reflection and research, on their own time and bring what they have learned to a wider classroom discussion. They use their individual blog to compile research, explore and reflect on the content, and pose questions. These blogs then contribute to larger discussion, group projects, and shared reflections or questions.

            Lastly, in my experience, I usually do not see instructors and students working collaboratively to find learning tools that work for them. Where Boettcher (2016), and Nolan and Darby (2019) all argue for the importance of receiving insight and consent in the learning tools chosen, I have not suggested or worked with instructors using this suggestion intentionally. I suggest that instructors ask for feedback on learning tools but, I have not made a point to suggest to instructors that they address it at the beginning of the class. I definitely need to do this!

Interpretive: What are your “aha” moments related to this topic? What new insights do you now have?

Throughout my research and reading on blogs and other eLearning tools, I have had many “aha” moments. The first being the importance of consent when selecting learning tools. After reading various arguments for receiving consent from learners on which tools to use, I have gained insight on how giving students the opportunity to discuss and take part in selecting tools, would be a great way to encourage and facilitate student engagement. 

Another insight I had is the role of the blogs as a tool for collective empowerment and autonomy (Hunter, 2008). While, I have used the blog as a tool for students to reflect, engage, and question online content. I had not thought of the blog as a tool to empower collective collaboration and autonomy simultaneously. Hunter (2008) shows that the blog allows students to use their creativity and independence to create a safe space for reflection and critical thinking, while also allowing students to collaborate together. This collaboration may take different forms, it might bring what they reflected on to a central discussion or sharing blog posts where students can engage with one another. 

Decisional: How can this new learning be applied to your online course?

            I am going to apply this learning in several ways. The first thing I plan on doing is creating space at the beginning of each course to discuss different learning tools; students’ previous experience with them, what tools spark curiosity and creativity, and what they feel would suit the needs of the course. I will likely bring a few options for them to ground the conversation but, also be open to different suggestions. Or if I am going to be using blogs, allow them to select the platform they would like to use. I am going to encourage them to establish their own blogs using a platform that works for them, and the privacy settings they feel most comfortable with when sharing to the class. To encourage collaboration, I am going to suggest that students use their blog for reflection and research, and also create posts that can be shared publicly with the class or ask them to bring their ideas to a discussion forum.

            Lastly, I am also going to work on resources for faculty on consent when using learning tools and in different ways to utilize blogs in online learning. These will include the research I did above and some examples or guiding questions.

References

Boettcher, J. V. (2016). Online Teaching Survival Guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. S.l.: Jossey-Bass inc, U S.

Culatta, R. (2009, October 13). Designing Online Learning [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv-_GCFdLdo&feature=youtu.be

Darby, F., & Nolan, W. (2019). Let’s Solve the Right Problem: Intentional Teaching with Technology. Teaching with Technology: Tools and Strategies to Improve Student Learner, 18-19.

Hunter, M. (2008). Social Media for Adult Online Learners and Educators. In Education for a Digital World (pp. 429-439). Vancouver, BC: BCcampus and Commonwealth of Learning.

Weimer, M. (2019). Using a Blog to Enhance Student Participation. Teaching with Technology: Tools and Strategies to Improve Student Learner, 12-13.

Reflective Writing #1: Pedagogy of Online Learning

Objective: What have you learned about this topic?

           Online learning has quickly become the primary mode of instructional delivery due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Instructors who are may or may not have been resistant to online teaching are now required to deliver courses online. Before the pandemic, the Horizon Report (Andrew et al., 2019) noted that instructors face significant challenges when adopting educational technology including digital fluency and educational resources for learning about educational technology and the role of the instructor online. In comparison, Johnson and Veletsianos (2020) summary of the Canadian Pulse Project pointed out key survey findings from the beginning of the pandemic. They found that instructors in high education needed the following supports to effectively teach online:

  1. Pedological Strategies for online teaching.
  2. Strategies for supporting students in learning online, and
  3. Assessment strategies for teaching online. (p.1)

These findings reflect research on online teaching prior to and during the pandemic, and present significant professional development needs for instructors teaching online. They present that instructors require both technical and theoretical training to effectively teaching online. While resistance to online education is not reported as a significant barrier to teaching online, these findings present a significant amount of instructional support required. Richardson (2020), did a survey on professional development for high education instructors they found that instructors were receptive and appreciative of professional development training in online teaching training. Richardson found that 10 out of 13 instructors found it valuable (p.76). In particular, the training on online pedagogy and working Learning Management Systems.

           Although there is some resistance to teaching online, largely due to the barrier’s instructors face, they do find professional development in online teaching valuable. Therefore, to move forward instructors require more training in online pedagogy, supporting students online, assessment strategies, and working with educational technology. 

Reflective: What has been your experience with this topic? How has it impacted your life?

           Over the past few months, I have been working as an Instructional Designer in the Teaching and Learning Centre at Emily Carr. Right now, my primary role is to assist instructors with the transition to online teaching. This includes both the pedagogical and technical aspects of teaching online. I have experienced a combination of approaches to online learning, some instructors are very resistant to applying online pedagogy while others are very keen to adopt it. For example, some instructors insist on continuing to deliver 3-6 hours of synchronous lectures per week while others are creating micro-lectures and doing a combination of synchronous and asynchronous activities.

           In reflection on the survey findings, I have witnessed the several challenges instructors face when teaching online. I’ve noted the varying level of digital literacy among instructors. Some of them are very comfortable learning new technology and find the process easy, while others face more barriers and challenges in adopting new technology. I feel that especially with the pandemic, instructors have been required to adopt technology quite quickly with on-the-go training rather than receiving training before delivering courses.

           I’ve also noted that attendance and participation in professional development training in my department varies. There are about 20 instructors who consistently attend workshops on Moodle, educational technologies, and teaching online. While the other attendees are more sporadic or we do not see them at all.

           Lastly, I have experienced the challenges instructors face when supporting students online. This varies from heated discussion topics to students reaching out for mental health support. Instructors have often communicated to me and my department that they don’t feel prepared to deal with both conflict in an online classroom and the surrounding mental health challenges students face. While Emily Carr has resources for Student Wellness, the resources for effective communication and conflict resolution online need further attention and development.

Interpretive: What are your “aha” moments related to this topic? What new insights do you now have?

           After researching the barriers instructors face when teaching online and the accompanying support they require, I have gained new insights on why instructors may feel resistant to online teaching or face significant challenges. All of three surveys (Richardson, 2020; Johnson & Veletsianos, 2020; Andrew et al., 2019) show that a lot of professional development and teaching supports are required to assist instructors with teaching online. I have realized that this is not limited to just learning the technology but also learning how to communicate and help students online, and learning about online pedagogy.

           I have new insights on how much learning is required from everyone; teachers, administrators, students, and those who support staff such as my department in the Teaching and Learning Centre. Like the Canadian Pulse Project survey found, we have also been looking for ways to deliver online pedagogy to instructors and learn more about it quickly. The article “Learning with Empathy” Evans showed that teaching supports need to further connect with faculty due to COVID-19 and the transition to online learning (2020). It argued that teaching supports need to connect with faculty more readily by listening, being present, and creating continuous bonds. This isn’t necessarily a new insight for me, as I have been doing the following, but the last point on continuous bond was insightful for me. I have been trying to establish bonds with instructors so I can continue to educate and help instructors with their online teaching.

Decisional: How can this new learning be applied to your online course?

There are several ways I can apply what I have learned to my online teaching and my work with instructors. Specifically, I am going to focus on the two areas outline by the Canadian Pulse Project (Johnson & Veletsianos, 2020) and Richardson’s (2020) findings. I am going to develop online pedagogical resources and learning management resources for instructors. I have created several resources for our Moodle (LMS) that are available to faculty. But I have not created any online pedagogical resources for them or made these resources available in Moodle (right now they are on a website). Therefore, I am going to create a mini online course for faculty on online instructional delivery and online pedagogy. I feel that this will be a starting point for helping instructors learn about the basics of online teaching. Also, I am going to create an instructor Moodle guide on our Emily Carr Moodle. This will be specific to our Moodle with how-to videos. I hope that these two projects will help faculty with their online teaching and be a useful resource throughout the coming terms.

References

Alexander, B., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knot, J., McCormak, M., Pomerantz, J., . . . Weber, N. (2019). EDCUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 High Education Edition. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2019/4/2019horizonreport.pdf

Evans, N. (2020). Leading with Empathy: Supporting Faculty through COVID‐19 and Beyond. The Department Chair, 31(1), 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.30336

Johnson, N., & Veletsianos, G. (2020, July 13). Professional development for the 2020 fall semester: How to help faculty and administrators prepare. Retrieved November 19, 2020, from https://www.universityaffairs.ca/career-advice/career-advice-article/professional-development-for-the-2020-fall-semester-how-to-help-faculty-and-administrators-prepare/

Richardson, Jayson W, Hollis, Ericka, Pritchard, Mikah, & Novosel-Lingat, John Eric M. (2020). Shifting Teaching and Learning in Online Learning Spaces: An Investigation of a Faculty Online Teaching and Learning Initiative. Online Learning (Newburyport, Mass.), 24(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i1.1629

Reflections: Start of a New Term

It is the start of a new term at the Teaching and Learning Centre. This week I will be running multiple workshops on Moodle, Grading Online, and Online Teaching. After this week, I will be starting to develop and course for instructors on how to teach online. The course will be self-paced, ungraded, and will incorporate ideas from Universal Learning Design (ULD). I have found some helpful resources including a UDL open source course https://moodle.gprc.ab.ca/mod/resource/view.php?id=5674

I am excited to get started on this course! After the first few weeks of term pass. In the meantime, I will be working one on one with faculty to set-up their courses and troubleshoot along the way.