This activity/module will focus on how to deliver art critiques online. It will be delivered through Moodle and will be part of a larger course on online teaching for art and design. The students of the course will include instructors within the faculty of art and design at Emily Carr University including;
· graduate students and/or teaching assistants
· sessional instructors
· new instructors
· tenured faculty
· Age range 25-65+
· Education level: Graduate degree or higher. Some learners may be in the middle of their graduate degree.
· The majority of learners are new to online teaching but, a few are seasoned online instructors.
MODULE 4: Online Critiques
Learning Objectives:
- Identify the differences and similarities between facilitating a face-to-face critique and an online critique.
- Demonstrate potential challenges when facilitating an online critique; and identify key components of a skillfully facilitated online critique.
- Develop a plan for delivering and facilitating an art critique online.
- Identify potential learning tools and/or platforms for online art critiques.
MODULE 4 Checklist
- Read course resources
- Watch course resources
- Post to the discussion forum
- Complete Online Art Critique Proposal
MODULE 4 Resources
Watch “Room of Silence”
Sherrid, E. (2016, March 31). Room of Silence. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/161259012
Read “Can you Teach Art Online?”
Dancewicz, K. (2020, April 17). Can You Teach Art Online? Retrieved from https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/teaching-art-online-covid-19-professors-strategies-1202684147
Watch “Teaching Studio Art Online: 5 Ways to Critique Art Online”
Art Prof: Create & Critique. (2020, March 14). Teaching Studio Art Online: 5 Ways to Critique Art Online. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQgSdwl4GNo
Read “A teacher’s guide to moderating online discussion forums: From theory to practice”
Feenberg, Andrew & Xin, Cindy. (2002). A teacher’s guide to moderating online discussion forums: From theory to practice. Retrieved April. 28. 2005.
Read “Developing Learning Community in Online Asynchronous College Courses: The Role of Teaching Presence”
Shea, P., Li, C., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2019). Developing Learning Community in Online Asynchronous College Courses: The Role of Teaching Presence. Online Learning, 9(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779
MODULE 4: Activities
Discussion Forum Post (Ungraded)
Use the Moodle discussion forum provided
Reflect on what you have learned so far. In your experience, what are some key differences and between facilitating a face-to-face critique and an online critique? Share your thoughts and respond to 2 or more of your peers.
Online Critique Proposal (15%)
Write a proposal for how you would deliver and facilitate a critique online. Reflect on what you know about facilitating face-to-face critiques, and combine it with what you have learned about facilitating them online. You can use any medium for this proposal (Word, InDesign, PowerPoint, Video etc.)
In the proposal answer the following question (15%):
- What are the differences and similarities between facilitating a face-to-face critique and an online critique?
- How will you deliver the art critique? What learning tools or platform will you use?
- How will students engage, share work, and interact in the critique?
- What challenges might you face when facilitating this online critique? How might you solve them?
This is how you will be graded:
| Highly Competent (3) | Fairly Competent (2) | Not Yet Competent (1) | |
| Proposal Format (30%) | Proposal is well-organized, clear, and concise. It is easy to read and follow. All the assignment components are there. | All of the assignment components are present. However, the proposal lacks organization and clarity. | Not all of the proposal components are present. It lacks organization and clarity. |
| Proposal Questions (30%) | All of the proposal questions are addressed and answered comprehensively. | All of the proposal questions are addressed and answered satisfactorily. | Not all of the questions are addressed and/or do not have sufficiently developed answers. |
| Analysis & Evidence (30%) | The proposal questions are answered with several external sources and with a critical and comprehensive analysis. | The proposal questions are answered with some external sources. The analysis is satisfactory. | The proposal questions are answered without external sources or evidence. There is no clear analysis. |
| Writing Skills (10%) | Writing is clear, professional, and does not have grammatical errors. | Writing contains minor grammatical errors and lacks clarity in some areas. | Writing contains major grammatical errors and lacks clarity overall. |
Rationale
The goal of this module is to give my learners the knowledge and teaching strategies to transition their face-to-face critiques online. Most of the learners for this course will be new or tenure instructors, graduate students, or administrators. The rationale behind the first learning objective is to encourage the students taking this course to take what they already know about critiques and compare it to online delivery. The following learning objectives focus on learning and researching about online facilitation and discussion monitoring, as well as the different learning tools or platforms that could be useful for an online art critique. The videos and articles I have provided address each of these aspects of an online art critique.
I have included articles on monitoring and facilitating discussion forums and their connection to teacher presence. Also, I included a video and article on teaching art online, and delivering critiques online. Lastly, I included a documentary on the intricacies of marginalization, race and identity in art critiques and art classes. Together, I hope to create a solid foundation for my learners to begin their research and move on to the assessment phase of the module.
I chose a “Critique Proposal” because it is a tangible authentic assessment that would provide my learners with a plan and strategy for delivering their next art critique. As a course that is focused on professional development, the creation of teaching tools and strategies is an essential component of each module. I want my learners to feel that each assessment is a tool or resource they can draw from in their everyday teaching experience (Kelly, 2009). In Mark Lieberman (2018) interview with Dianne Conrad she argues for the importance of authentic assessments that encourage “real-life tasks or problems that learners can relate to” (pg.1). Delivering an art critique online is an issue instructor have been working through during COVID-19, and they often feel they are not prepared or comfortable delivering them asynchronously. Therefore, this assessment allows them to face this “real-life task” and work through it with research and supporting materials. Also, I want to adapt strategies from Universal Design for Learning by allowing my learners to use and research various learning tools and/or mediums for delivering their proposal (Toland, 2019). This assessment will allow my learners to receive feedback on the proposal before they deliver it to their students.
I am assessing the proposal through a rubric that focuses on four categories; 1) Proposal Format, 2) Proposal Questions, 3) Analysis & Evidence, and 4) Writing Skills. I decided to go with a rubric so that my learners could get comprehensive feedback on their proposal and to provide them with concrete guidelines on how to complete the proposal. The rubric provides them with the weight of each category and what they must achieve in order to be successful. It is a summative assessment as the goal is for the learners to take what they have learned and apply it to a final proposal. However, since this course is geared towards professional development, I view the rubric and assessment as a tool for the learners to build on and apply. Hopefully, by doing the assessment they can gain insight and knowledge that they can bring forward in their virtual classroom and feel more confident when delivering online critiques.
References
Art Prof: Create & Critique. (2020, March 14). Teaching Studio Art Online: 5 Ways to Critique Art Online. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQgSdwl4GNo
Bates, T. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age – Second Edition. Vancouver, B.C.: Tony Bates Associates Ltd. Retrieved from https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev2/
Dancewicz, K. (2020, April 17). Can You Teach Art Online? Retrieved from https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/teaching-art-online-covid-19-professors-strategies-1202684147
Feenberg, Andrew & Xin, Cindy. (2002). A teacher’s guide to moderating online discussion forums: From theory to practice. Retrieved April. 28. 2005.
Kelly, R. (2009). Authentic Experiences, Assessment Develop Online Students’ Marketable Skills. Faculty Focus: Assessing Online Learning: Strategies, Challenges and Opportunities, 6-7.
Lieberman, M. (2018). Q&A: Toward Better Assessments in Online Courses. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/10/31/qa-strategies-better-assessments-online-learning.
Shea, P., Li, C., Swan, K., & Pickett, A. (2019). Developing Learning Community in Online Asynchronous College Courses: The Role of Teaching Presence. Online Learning, 9(4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i4.1779
Sherrid, E. (2016, March 31). Room of Silence. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/161259012.

